4 Comments

I saw your inquiry on the 2nd smartest guy substack and didn't want to get in the middle of a comment war. I think dr. ardis is definitely on to something with his snake/snail venom theory and your questions were spot on...i think it was dismissed out of hand too easily. Dr. Ardis has said multiple times that he postulated a water delivery method, but that it could be delivered in numerous ways like aerosolized in closed spaces like buildings, surface contact, in food and beverage etc. He has done a ton of research and everything that I have looked into so far that he talks about seems to be true. (30+ tabs in the rabbit hole later). I think that we need to keep our heads on a swivel and investigate all plausable theories. I would not be surprised if several things are being used in conjunction. Even if he turns out to be wrong, I don't agree that people should dismiss his theories because of where he might have debuted his theory or whose podcast he might have spoken on. Other people are putting together theories on things they are finding under the microscope in blood like: hydras, hydrogel, graphene oxide, nanobots, rouleaux (clumped red blood cells), self-assembling circuits etc. We need to positively add to the discussions and world-wide investigations and not call each other clowns. Something you might like to dig into, Dr. Andreas Kalcker has a website dedicated to his work with CDS (Chlorine dioxide Solution) during COVID and the success he had in south america. Anecdotally, I learned that Chlorine dioxide can/does help with snakebites both topically and internally. Mike Adams did a Health Ranger podcast about how he treated his dog with it after a bite. He is usually pretty good about citing research, but it was over the summer and I do not remember the podcast date. We all just need to keep digging!

Expand full comment